This bill renames and restructures an existing poverty oversight body into a legislative‑executive "economic justice and well‑being task force" and creates a new Sec. 1 with legislative findings endorsing a 10‑year plan to dismantle poverty. It amends RCW 74.08A.500, 74.08A.505, and 74.08A.510 to replace the former intergenerational poverty advisory committee with an economic justice and well‑being advisory council and to retitle the task force formerly tied to WorkFirst poverty reduction oversight. The bill establishes duties and procedural changes for the task force and advisory council: overseeing the budget and performance of the WorkFirst and TANF programs; determining evidence‑based outcome and performance measures for the 10‑year plan; developing accountability measures for agencies implementing the plan; collaborating with the advisory council and the Washington economic justice alliance; seeking input from lived experts and stakeholders; analyzing disaggregated data to understand differential impacts; and developing and recommending policy priorities to the governor and legislature. It requires relevant state agencies to provide regular reports on progress toward outcome measures, on the biennial and supplemental budget impacts on low‑income and vulnerable populations (in partnership with OFM and the Washington economic justice alliance), and on implementation activities. The bill also specifies staff support arrangements, agency obligations to respond to data requests, and reimbursement rules for legislative and nonlegislative members. The advisory council provisions address membership, leadership, meetings, decision rules, and member management: the council chooses cochairs from among its membership; task force cochairs serve two‑year terms; the secretary may remove a council member for inability or good cause; vacancies may be filled for unexpired terms; a majority constitutes a quorum; the council must meet at least quarterly when requested by the task force cochairs or council cochairs; and the council must base recommendations on verifiable data, gather input from diverse communities, monitor the 10‑year plan, and recommend priorities. The bill cites RCW 44.04.120 and chapter 43.03 RCW for reimbursement rules and RCW 43.03.050 and 43.03.060 for council travel reimbursement. Several textual and context details are incomplete or inconsistent in the extracted material: one section describes advisory council appointments as four‑year terms with staggered terms, while another states members are appointed every two years; the appointing authority for council members is not shown; the statutory definition or text for the "Washington economic justice alliance" is not provided; and some advisory council composition and operational details appear cut off or shown with edit markup, so full final wording and any additional amendments or effective dates are not available in the provided extracts.

If enacted, the bill refocuses and renames the existing oversight bodies into an "economic justice and well-being" task force and advisory council charged with driving a 10-year plan to dismantle poverty. State agencies that run or touch WorkFirst, TANF, and related services (notably DSHS, DCYF, Commerce, Employment Security, OSPI, Health, Corrections, Revenue, HCA, workforce and higher education boards, and related commissions) will face new, regular reporting and data obligations, must respond promptly to data requests from task force cochairs, and will be subject to new accountability and budget-impact reviews done in partnership with OFM and the Washington economic justice alliance. The advisory council will get department staff support and members may receive travel reimbursement; legislative members of the task force keep statutory travel reimbursement. Practically, agencies will need to assign staff time and data-analysis capacity to meet reporting, monitoring, and collaboration demands, and budgets may be scrutinized for their effects on low-income and vulnerable people, which could shift program priorities or require reallocations. There will also be ongoing costs for meetings, staff support, and possible reimbursements. Important details are unclear from the provided text—specifically the exact appointment terms for advisory council members and some composition and procedural rules—so the full administrative and budgetary impact cannot be precisely determined from these extracts.