AN ACT Relating to correcting terminology to align the revised code of Washington with recent reorganization at the department of social and health services;
Bill Description
Correcting terminology to align the revised code of Washington with recent reorganization at the department of social and health services.
What this bill does Powered by Legitron
This bill reenacts and amends many existing statutes across public defense, civil legal aid, developmental disability services, child welfare permanency and visitation, behavioral health for children and youth, long-term care oversight, and state forecasting and housing advisory functions. It creates new roles and entities (including a kinship care legal aid coordinator at the office of civil legal aid, a required contract model for the office of the developmental disabilities ombuds, a rapid care team managed by the children and youth multisystem care project director, and a children and youth behavioral health work group and strategic plan process), transfers certain county and DSHS public defense duties to the office of public defense, and revises many procedural, reporting, and interagency coordination requirements. The bill amends competency and sanity evaluation procedures in criminal cases (evaluator appointment, required contents of reports, record access, inpatient transport time limits, bail procedures, and prosecutor motions during evaluation periods) and sets processes for defendants found incompetent due to intellectual or developmental disability, dementia, or traumatic brain injury, including directing the department to connect such individuals to home and community services rather than competency restoration in specified circumstances.
The measure changes administrative procedures and service rules for people with developmental disabilities and related long-term care services: it prescribes client rights and grievance/appeal and confidentiality procedures, requires posting of complaint and ombuds contact information, establishes complaint investigation timelines and on-site revisit requirements, requires annual and biennial reports and service‑request lists, prohibits use of IQ scores to determine developmental disability beginning July 1, 2025 (with protections for people already eligible), and requires DSHS to design wraparound and transition programs and school‑to‑work and regional transition networks. It also establishes or continues several collaboratives and advisory bodies (a dementia action collaborative with reporting deadlines, an advisory committee on permanent supportive housing with reporting through 2027, and caseload forecasting changes) and authorizes the Health Care Authority to contract for statewide behavioral health landscape, gap, and evidence analyses to inform a strategic plan with set milestones.
The bill creates or amends penalties and enforcement procedures: it authorizes a civil penalty up to $3,000 for retaliatory treatment of residents who file complaints and reiterates unlawful disclosure of public assistance recipient lists as a gross misdemeanor. It imposes numerous new or modified reporting and timing requirements (for example, the kinship coordinator’s biennial report due December 1 of even-numbered years; dementia plan updates due October 1; various budgeting and forecast deadlines), and contains specified effective or operative dates in several sections (including a stated effective date of July 1, 2026 and a noted transfer of certain appropriations effective July 1, 2023). Several extracted sections were incomplete or used undefined shorthand (for example, references to “the department” or “secretary” without full identification and portions of RCW 10.77.400 and other subsections cut off), so some details and cross-references are uncertain from the provided excerpts.
Why it matters Powered by Legitron
If enacted, the bill creates new roles and deadlines and shifts several program responsibilities so states and providers must change how they operate. The Office of Civil Legal Aid would need funding to add a kinship care legal aid coordinator to build local legal assistance for relatives caring for children, and the Office of Public Defense picks up responsibility and related funds for defending indigent people committed after acquittal by reason of insanity (with records and appropriations transferred and new authority to continue existing counsel in some cases). Courts, prosecutors, and evaluators will follow more detailed rules for competency and insanity evaluations, and the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) must connect people found incompetent because of intellectual/developmental disability, dementia, or traumatic brain injury to community wraparound services instead of competency restoration, develop referral and housing supports (subject to available funds), and meet new timelines and reporting duties for permanency planning, visitation, and rapid care teams. The bill also tightens consumer protections and complaint processes for long-term care and community residential providers, requires posting and notification of enforcement actions, mandates on-site revisits and timelines for investigations, and creates a civil‑penalty deterrent for retaliation (up to $3,000, with an effective date noted for some sections).
The groups most affected are DSHS and its home and community living component, county public defense systems and the Office of Public Defense, the Office of Civil Legal Aid, courts and prosecutors, foster/kin caregivers and children, adult family homes and other residential service providers, and behavioral health agencies. Agencies will face new or reassigned responsibilities, additional reporting and coordination duties, and potential costs for staffing, service development, and transportation or supervised visitation arrangements; providers will face tighter notice, transition, and grievance requirements and possible penalties for retaliation or noncompliance. Several implementation details in the extracted text are incomplete (for example, some agency names and certain procedural subsections are cut off), so exact workload, funding needs, and deadlines for particular duties could change once the full bill language and appropriation specifics are available.