LegislativeLabs.ai Logo
Legislative Labs
  • Bring the Statehouse to your House.
    • FAQ

      Help using Legislative Labs
    • Support

      Contact us for assistance.
    • Legal

      Terms & Conditions.
    • Privacy

      What we do with your information.
    • Choose Your Plan

      Track, Act, Learn.
    • Analytics

      Intelligence & analytics on previous sessions.
    • Bill History

      Detailed historical bill information.
    • Sponsor Detail

      Detailed sponsor bill performance.
    • About Us

      The reason for Legislative Labs.
    • Classroom

      Bring the Statehouse to the Schoolhouse.
    • BETA

      Session Dashboard

      Live predictions on introduced legislation.
    • BETA

      Bill Drafting

      Predictions on draft legislation.
    • BETA

      Legitron AI

      Legislation made simple with AI.
    • Session Results

      Legislative session analytics.
    • Sign in

SB 5821

Momentum Bucket Early Stage
Legal Title AN ACT Relating to integrating advanced nuclear energy into the state energy strategy;
Bill Description Integrating advanced nuclear energy into the state energy strategy.
What this bill does
Powered by Legitron
Senate Bill 5821 adds a new section to chapter 43.21F RCW directing the Washington State Department of Commerce to seek nonstate gifts, grants, or contributions to develop and publish a "nuclear power strategic framework" by December 15, 2026 if sufficient nonstate funds are received. This is a new statutory planning requirement (a procedural change) rather than an authorization to build or finance projects. The required framework must identify state objectives for new fission nuclear generation, key actions for government entities, joint operating agencies, utilities, tribes, and other stakeholders, and outline the processes to be navigated before new fission generation could be built and produce power (including financing, siting, permitting, tribal consultation, workforce, and regulatory processes). It must assess challenges and opportunities, consider multistate partnerships, include policy recommendations (such as regulatory reforms, tax and financial supports, education and workforce programs), consider expediting or curtailing state siting/permitting to avoid redundancy with federal rules, give preference or expedited review to sites previously proposed or used for power generation (including sites within the Hanford footprint), identify mechanisms to mitigate financial risks, address land use impacts, and identify anticipated impacts on economic well‑being, workforce development, and electric‑sector goals like reliability and affordability. The department must solicit guidance from the energy strategy advisory committee referenced in RCW 43.21F.090, provide public comment opportunities on a draft, and integrate the framework into the next review and update of the state energy strategy. The duty to proceed is explicitly conditional on receiving sufficient nonstate funds under the department’s authority in RCW 43.330.040(2)(c). The bill is a planning and policy recommendation mandate and does not itself authorize construction, create new crimes, change penalties, or implement funding or regulatory changes. Important gaps in the text provided include no definition of what constitutes "sufficient" funding, no technical or statutory definition of "new fission nuclear power generation," and no details on the membership or current status of the referenced energy strategy advisory committee.
Why it matters
Powered by Legitron
If enacted, the Department of Commerce will seek outside funding to prepare a statewide plan by December 15, 2026 that lays out goals, recommended actions, and the permitting, siting, financing, workforce, tribal consultation, and regulatory steps needed to add advanced fission nuclear generation in Washington. The resulting framework could steer future choices by identifying preferred sites (including previously proposed locations, the Hanford footprint, and former coal or gas sites), suggesting regulatory or financial supports, and recommending multistate partnerships and risk‑mitigation tools, but it does not itself authorize projects or change existing law. The department, utilities, local governments, joint operating agencies, tribes, nearby states, and the Tri‑Cities workforce are most directly affected: Commerce will spend staff time soliciting funds and coordinating the plan (with those costs to come from nonstate contributions if they are deemed sufficient), and other stakeholders will be expected to provide input and may see their future options and timelines shift if policymakers adopt the framework’s recommendations. Key uncertainties are whether adequate nonstate funding will arrive, what exactly counts as “new fission nuclear power generation,” and whether recommended policy changes will be enacted.
Official Documents View Full Bill Text
Follow this bill

SB 5821 Position - A premium account is required to save position information.

Saving your position first...
Generating hearing testimony using your position and notes...
Generating Bill Comment using your position and notes...

Click to view plans

SB 5821 Details and Bill Topics

Details

Date Introduced 01/12/2026
Originating Chamber Senate
Biennium 2025-26
Total Campaign Dollars Backing Bill $5,827,424.50

Bill Topics

COMMERCE, DEPARTMENT OF
ENERGY

SB 5821 Sponsors and Committee Hearings

Sponsors

Senator Braun (Primary)
Senator Shewmake
Senator Boehnke
Senator Christian
Senator Conway
Senator Dozier
Senator Gildon
Senator Holy
Senator Riccelli
Senator Salomon
Senator Short
Senator Warnick
Senator Wellman
Senator J. Wilson

Committee Hearings

Hearing Senate Environment, Energy & Technology (Public)
Go to SB 5821 at leg.wa.gov

SB 5821 Bill Timeline

Early Stage
1/11/2026
SEnvironment, E
First reading, referred to Environment, Energy & Technology.
12/2/2025
SEnvironment, E
Prefiled for introduction.

You have 3 pending action.

Legitron™ is a trademark of Legislative Labs, Inc.

© 2026 - Legislative Labs