LegislativeLabs.ai Logo
Legislative Labs
  • Bring the Statehouse to your House.
    • FAQ

      Help using Legislative Labs
    • Support

      Contact us for assistance.
    • Legal

      Terms & Conditions.
    • Privacy

      What we do with your information.
    • Choose Your Plan

      Track, Act, Learn.
    • Analytics

      Intelligence & analytics on previous sessions.
    • Bill History

      Detailed historical bill information.
    • Sponsor Detail

      Detailed sponsor bill performance.
    • About Us

      The reason for Legislative Labs.
    • Classroom

      Bring the Statehouse to the Schoolhouse.
    • BETA

      Session Dashboard

      Live predictions on introduced legislation.
    • BETA

      Bill Drafting

      Predictions on draft legislation.
    • BETA

      Legitron AI

      Legislation made simple with AI.
    • Session Results

      Legislative session analytics.
    • Sign in

ESSB 5500

Momentum Bucket Early Stage
Legal Title AN ACT Relating to defining the cost of quality child care for the biennial survey;
Bill Description Modernizing reimbursement rates for the working connections child care program. (REVISED FOR ENGROSSED: Defining the cost of quality child care for the biennial survey.)
What this bill does
Powered by Legitron
This bill amends RCW 43.216.829 to require the state department identified in that section to publish, and submit to relevant legislative committees, three items by June 1 of every even-numbered year: a current cost of quality child care study, a cost of quality child care study as defined by the early educator design team, and a market rate survey. This is a procedural reporting requirement change rather than a new crime or penalty change. The bill defines the two types of cost studies and sets minimum elements the department’s cost estimation models must include. The “cost of quality child care study as defined by the early educator design team” must use a model developed in consultation with and recommended by that team and must include at minimum fixed costs for staff salaries based on a living wage scale identified by the team; benefits including paid leave, employer retirement contributions, and expenses related to offering discretionary benefits such as health and life insurance; family engagement activities and/or staff; planning release time; costs for educational materials and curriculum; and professional development supports. The “current cost of quality child care study” must use a model that includes at minimum current costs for staff salaries, benefits, family engagement activities, planning release time, educational materials and curriculum, and professional development supports. The provision names the department, the early educator design team, and relevant legislative committees as affected parties, and references compliance with RCW 43.01.036. The excerpt does not identify which specific state department is meant, does not describe the composition or authority of the early educator design team, does not specify which legislative committees are “relevant,” and does not provide model details beyond the listed minimum factors; additional bill text or statutory context may be needed for full interpretation.
Why it matters
Powered by Legitron
If enacted, a state agency will be required every even-numbered year by June 1 to produce and publish three things: a current cost-of-quality child care study, a second cost study that uses a model recommended by the early educator design team (which must count things like living-wage-based staff salaries, benefits, family engagement, planning time, materials, and professional development), and a market rate survey, and to send those reports to relevant legislative committees. In practice this will give lawmakers a regular, standardized set of cost figures that explicitly include living-wage salary and benefit estimates, which makes it more likely future budget or policy discussions will be based on higher, more comprehensive cost estimates for running quality child care. The agencies and people most directly affected are the department that must produce the reports (which will need staff time or contracts to prepare them), the early educator design team (whose chosen model and living wage scale will shape the results), and child care employers and staff (whose wages and benefit costs will be documented and could influence funding or subsidy decisions). Important details are missing from the excerpt—specifically which state department must act, which legislative committees count as "relevant," and the full makeup or authority of the early educator design team—so how quickly and exactly these reports will be produced and used is unclear.
Official Documents View Full Bill Text
Follow this bill

ESSB 5500 Position - A premium account is required to save position information.

Saving your position first...
Generating hearing testimony using your position and notes...
Generating Bill Comment using your position and notes...

Click to view plans

ESSB 5500 Details and Bill Topics

Details

Date Introduced 02/12/2025
Originating Chamber Senate
Biennium 2025-26
Total Campaign Dollars Backing Bill $4,740,510.50

Bill Topics

CHILD CARE

ESSB 5500 Sponsors and Committee Hearings

Sponsors

Senator Alvarado (Primary)
Senator C. Wilson
Senator Trudeau
Senator Valdez
Senator Wellman
Senator Lovelett
Senator Frame
Senator Salomon
Senator Bateman
Senator Hasegawa
Senator Krishnadasan
Senator Nobles
Senator Saldaña

Committee Hearings

Hearing Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education (Public)
Hearing Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education (Executive)
Hearing House Appropriations (Public)
Hearing House Appropriations (Executive)
Go to ESSB 5500 at leg.wa.gov

ESSB 5500 Bill Timeline

Early Stage
3/11/2026
SRules 3
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
3/1/2026
SRules 3
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
2/26/2026
SRules 3
APP - Majority; do pass.
2/26/2026
SRules 3
APP - Executive action taken by committee.
1/29/2026
SRules 3
First reading, referred to Appropriations.
1/27/2026
SRules 3
Third reading, passed; yeas, 30; nays, 19; absent, 0; excused, 0.
1/27/2026
SRules 3
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
1/27/2026
SRules 3
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
1/27/2026
SRules 3
1st substitute bill substituted.
1/11/2026
SRules 3
Moved to Rules White Sheet.
1/11/2026
SRules 3
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
3/16/2025
SRules 3
Senate Rules "X" file.
2/18/2025
SRules 3
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
2/12/2025
SRules 3
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
2/11/2025
SRules 3
Minority; do not pass.
2/11/2025
SRules 3
EDU - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
1/26/2025
Ssubst for
First reading, referred to Early Learning & K-12 Education.

You have 3 pending action.

Legitron™ is a trademark of Legislative Labs, Inc.

© 2026 - Legislative Labs