| Momentum Bucket | Early Stage |
| Legal Title | AN ACT Relating to authorizing the use of automated vehicle noise enforcement cameras in vehicle-racing camera enforcement zones; |
| Bill Description | Authorizing the use of automated vehicle noise enforcement cameras in vehicle-racing camera enforcement zones. |
|
What this bill does
Powered by Legitron |
This bill adds a new category of automated enforcement—the "automated vehicle noise enforcement camera"—and expands and revises rules for automated traffic safety cameras generally. It authorizes cities and counties, by local ordinance, to use automated traffic safety cameras (including the new noise cameras) in designated zones, requires advance site analyses with equity and need considerations before adding or relocating cameras, prohibits camera use on on‑ramps to limited access facilities, and requires visible signage at least 30 days before activation. The act amends several existing RCW sections, reenacts and amends RCW 46.16A.120, and adds a new section to chapter 46.63 RCW.
The bill makes a number of procedural and administrative changes: it limits what camera systems may record (vehicle and license plate images; noise cameras may capture audio only immediately before, during, and after a violation), restricts public access to images and audio and limits retention to what is necessary for enforcement, requires evidence certificates to be prima facie evidence and available for inspection, and allows law enforcement officers and trained, certified civilian employees to issue notices from automated systems. It prescribes notice and processing timelines (notices mailed within 14 days, vehicle registration notices about 120 days before expiration, and withholding of renewal for unresolved violations except in specified circumstances), treats camera infractions like parking infractions for processing, caps civil penalties at $145 (indexed for inflation beginning 2029) with a potential doubling in school speed zones, creates eligibility for reduced fines for some public assistance or WIC recipients, restricts vendor compensation models, limits and directs uses of revenue (including a deposit of 25% of excess funds into the Cooper Jones active transportation safety account beginning four years after new cameras in use post‑June 6, 2024), and requires local and statewide reporting beginning in 2026. The act takes effect January 1, 2026.
Legally, the changes are procedural and regulatory: they create a new device classification, establish new enforcement procedures and evidentiary rules (including a prima facie presumption that a registered owner is responsible for a vehicle detected by an automated system, rebuttable by sworn statement), change fee and revenue rules, and amend who may issue infractions and how registrations may be withheld. The extracted material is incomplete in places: portions of referenced subsections and some amended RCW text are missing, the specific identity of "the department" referenced in multiple provisions is not given here, and several cross‑referenced sections (including subsection (9) and parts of RCW 46.16A.120) are not included in the provided facts.
|
|
Why it matters
Powered by Legitron |
If enacted, cities and counties will be able to add camera systems that pair cameras and microphones to detect street racing and loud vehicle equipment, but only in narrowly designated racing enforcement zones and only after doing a written location analysis that considers equity and documented need. Local governments will face new upfront and ongoing costs and responsibilities: installing signage at least 30 days before activation, training and certifying civilian reviewers, carrying out performance audits of vendors if contracts lack quality controls, operating and reporting on programs annually, and following limits on how camera revenues can be used (primarily for traffic safety projects and program costs). Vendors will no longer be paid based on fines, and jurisdictions with populations over 10,000 will be expected to direct safety investments to low-income, high-crash areas; after four years of use some excess revenue must flow to a statewide active transportation account, so net local revenue may be constrained.
Drivers, renters, and rental car companies will see more infractions issued by camera evidence that are mailed quickly and treated like parking citations rather than moving violations, so they generally won’t appear on driving records but can affect registration renewal until paid; eligible people on certain public assistance or WIC can get a 50% reduction for a first violation and short-window repeats. Rental companies must respond to agency notices within 18 days or face liability. Privacy protections and limits on recorded data (no faces; audio only immediately around a violation) are required, but some implementation details are unclear from the provided text—for example which specific “department” handles records and some referenced subsections are missing—so cities and vendors may need further guidance before full rollout.
|
| Official Documents | View Full Bill Text |
| Date Introduced | 01/22/2025 |
| Originating Chamber | Senate |
| Biennium | 2025-26 |
| Total Campaign Dollars Backing Bill | $1,459,815.25 |
| LAW ENFORCEMENT |
| Hearing | Senate Transportation (Public) |