| Momentum Bucket | Early Stage |
| Legal Title | AN ACT Relating to promoting agritourism in Washington; |
| Bill Description | Promoting agritourism in Washington. |
|
What this bill does
Powered by Legitron |
This bill creates a new law by adding a new section to chapter 19.27 RCW that provides an exemption from the building code standards that apply to a commercial building permit for agricultural buildings when those buildings are used for agritourism activities. The exemption does not remove requirements for standards that meet all life and fire safety requirements.
The exemption applies only if the building is used for agritourism activities six months or less each year. The bill references the definition of "agritourism activities" in RCW 4.24.830 but does not include that definition in the extracted text. Agricultural building owners and operators who use buildings for agritourism are the affected parties identified.
The extracted text does not specify which agency enforces or administers the exemption, whether it applies to new construction or existing buildings, how permitting processes are adjusted, the exact new section number beyond "Sec. 1," or any effective date or implementation details. The bill was read for the first time on 02/21/25 and lists Senate Local Government and sponsoring senators Warnick, Wagoner, Chapman, Dozier, and Wellman.
|
|
Why it matters
Powered by Legitron |
If enacted, farmers and other agricultural property owners who open farm buildings for agritourism part-time (six months or less each year) would likely face lower construction and permitting costs because those buildings would not have to meet the full set of commercial building code standards, though they would still need to meet all lifeand fire-safety requirements. That could reduce fees and administrative work for owners and lower permitting revenue and inspection workload for local building authorities.
The change most directly affects agricultural building owners/operators and local permitting agencies; owners gain more flexibility and lower up-front compliance costs but must track and justify that agritourism use stays within the six-month limit, while agencies may see reduced permit income and will need to decide how to enforce the exception. Important details are missing here: the bill text provided does not define “agritourism activities” (it points to RCW 4.24.830), does not say whether the exemption applies to new construction or existing buildings, and does not identify which agency enforces or how enforcement and permitting procedures should change.
|
| Official Documents | View Full Bill Text |
| Hearing | Senate Local Government (Public) |
| Hearing | Senate Local Government (Executive) |
| Hearing | House Local Government (Public) |