LegislativeLabs.ai Logo
Legislative Labs
  • Bring the Statehouse to your House.
    • FAQ

      Help using Legislative Labs
    • Support

      Contact us for assistance.
    • Legal

      Terms & Conditions.
    • Privacy

      What we do with your information.
    • Choose Your Plan

      Track, Act, Learn.
    • Analytics

      Intelligence & analytics on previous sessions.
    • Bill History

      Detailed historical bill information.
    • Sponsor Detail

      Detailed sponsor bill performance.
    • About Us

      The reason for Legislative Labs.
    • Classroom

      Bring the Statehouse to the Schoolhouse.
    • BETA

      Session Dashboard

      Live predictions on introduced legislation.
    • BETA

      Bill Drafting

      Predictions on draft legislation.
    • BETA

      Legitron AI

      Legislation made simple with AI.
    • Session Results

      Legislative session analytics.
    • Sign in

SB 5039

Momentum Bucket Viable
Legal Title AN ACT Relating to removing the exclusion from interest arbitration of Washington management service employees at the department of corrections;
Bill Description Removing the exclusion from interest arbitration of Washington management service employees at the department of corrections.
What this bill does
Powered by Legitron
This bill amends RCW 41.80.200 to provide interest arbitration as an alternative way to settle collective bargaining disputes for employees of the Department of Corrections who are covered by chapter 41.06 RCW. The amendment excludes confidential employees (as defined in RCW 41.80.005) and internal auditors, and it removes the prior exclusion of members of the Washington management service. It is a change to existing law that expands arbitration procedures and modifies the list of excluded employee groups. The amended section imposes negotiation and impasse procedures: bargaining must begin at least five months before the governor’s budget submission; if no agreement is reached within 60 days either party may declare impasse and seek mediation from the commission; if impasse remains and the director finds impasse after mediation, the dispute may go to interest arbitration. The bill sets deadlines and procedures for selecting and scheduling an arbitrator, requires written agreements naming the arbitrator and hearing dates, requires reservation of hearing dates, allocates costs (shared for arbitrator, court reporter, and hearing room; each party pays its own advocates), limits arbitrable issues to those subject to bargaining under specified RCW provisions, lists factors the arbitrator must consider, requires arbitration proceedings to be informal and recorded, allows subpoenas and superior court enforcement, and makes arbitrator awards final and enforceable in superior court but not binding on the legislature if it does not approve necessary funding. The text supplied does not define "internal auditors," does not reproduce the definitions or content of the cited provisions in RCW 41.80.020(1), (2), (3), RCW 41.80.040, or RCW 41.80.010(3), and does not identify the full statutory name or composition of the "commission" referenced, so those specifics are unclear from the provided material. The bill was prefiled 12/13/24 and read for the first time 01/13/25.
Why it matters
Powered by Legitron
If enacted, many Department of Corrections employees covered by chapter 41.06 RCW would gain a formal interest arbitration path to resolve contract impasses, meaning bargaining units and the governor’s designee must follow a tight schedule of negotiations, mediation, and, if needed, arbitration with shared hearing costs and each side paying its own legal expenses. Confidential employees and internal auditors remain excluded, and the apparent removal of the prior exclusion for Washington management service members suggests more managers may become eligible; parties must reserve hearing windows, pick an arbitrator from an FMCS list on a set timetable, and keep existing wages and conditions unchanged during proceedings. This change gives unions stronger, structured leverage to obtain binding settlements on many contract issues, but any arbitration award that requires new state funding for pay or fringe benefits still depends on the legislature approving those funds, so employees face a real risk that awarded compensation may not be paid if not appropriated. The extract does not define “confidential employees” or “internal auditors,” nor does it include the full list of non-arbitrable subjects or the commission’s detailed authority, so exactly who qualifies and which topics can be forced into arbitration is partly uncertain.
Official Documents View Full Bill Text
Follow this bill

SB 5039 Position - A premium account is required to save position information.

Saving your position first...
Generating hearing testimony using your position and notes...
Generating Bill Comment using your position and notes...

Click to view plans

SB 5039 Details and Bill Topics

Details

Date Introduced 01/13/2025
Originating Chamber Senate
Biennium 2025-26
Total Campaign Dollars Backing Bill $4,178,602.00

Bill Topics

CORRECTIONS, DEPARTMENT OF

SB 5039 Sponsors and Committee Hearings

Sponsors

Senator Conway (Primary)
Senator Saldaña
Senator Stanford
Senator Chapman
Senator Hasegawa
Senator Nobles
Senator Valdez
Senator Wellman

Committee Hearings

Hearing Senate Labor & Commerce (Public)
Hearing Senate Labor & Commerce (Executive)
Go to SB 5039 at leg.wa.gov

SB 5039 Bill Timeline

Viable
2/2/2025
SWays & Means
Referred to Ways & Means.
1/30/2025
SWays & Means
Minority; do not pass.
1/30/2025
SWays & Means
And refer to Ways & Means.
1/30/2025
SWays & Means
LC - Majority; do pass.
1/12/2025
SWays & Means
First reading, referred to Labor & Commerce.
12/12/2024
SWays & Means
Prefiled for introduction.

You have 3 pending action.

Legitron™ is a trademark of Legislative Labs, Inc.

© 2026 - Legislative Labs