LegislativeLabs.ai Logo
Legislative Labs
  • Bring the Statehouse to the Schoolhouse.
    • Classroom & Debate
    • Classroom

      Bring the Statehouse to the Schoolhouse.
    • Debate

      Learn to build a case.
    • Washington Standards Alignment

      See how civic practice maps to WA standards.
    • Intelligence
    • Analytics

      Intelligence & analytics on previous sessions.
    • Bill History

      Detailed historical bill information.
    • Sponsor Detail

      Detailed sponsor bill performance.
    • Session Dashboard

      Live predictions on introduced legislation.
    • Bill Drafting

      Predictions on draft legislation.
    • Session Results

      Legislative session analytics.
    • About
    • FAQ

      Help using Legislative Labs
    • Support

      Contact us for assistance.
    • Legal

      Terms & Conditions.
    • Privacy

      What we do with your information.
    • About Us

      The reason for Legislative Labs.
    • Sign in

SHB 2530

Momentum Bucket Viable
Legal Title AN ACT Relating to changing the deadline for forming a public facilities district for regional aquatics and sports facilities;
Bill Description Changing the deadline for forming a public facilities district for regional aquatics and sports facilities.
What this bill does
Powered by Legitron
This bill amends RCW 35.57.010 to modify which cities, towns, and combinations of those jurisdictions (and, in some cases, contiguous counties) may create and jointly operate a public facilities district (PFD). It allows legislative authorities of towns or cities in counties with population under one million to create a PFD, permits contiguous towns or cities to form a PFD by interlocal agreement under chapter 39.34 RCW, and permits a town or city (or contiguous towns/cities) to enter an interlocal agreement with a contiguous county or the county in which they are located to create a PFD. It also retains a limited exception for certain cities in counties over one million (cities with population between 80,000 and 115,000 that began construction of a regional center before July 1, 2008). The amendment also authorizes groups of previously created PFDs (including at least three contiguous towns/cities with combined population of at least 160,000, or two or more contiguous towns/cities or towns/cities plus counties that participated in a prior district) to create an additional PFD while allowing the earlier districts to continue in full corporate existence. The bill modifies governance and procedural rules for PFDs: it specifies district boundaries as coextensive with the creating jurisdiction(s), sets board sizes and appointment processes depending on how the district was formed, requires four-year board terms with initial staggered shorter terms, and prescribes membership rules for an additional-district board (odd-numbered, up to nine members, equal representation from participating cities/towns, and mechanisms to fill vacancies). For a board created under the additional-district provision to submit a tax proposition to voters under RCW 82.14.048, a majority of the members representing or appointed by each participating legislative authority must agree. The amendment also designates a PFD as a municipal corporation and an independent taxing authority and taxing district under the State Constitution, grants corporate powers (hire staff, enter contracts, sue and be sued), authorizes acquisition and transfer of real and personal property, and bars any direct or collateral legal challenge to a purportedly authorized PFD more than 30 days after creation by the legislative authority. This summary is based solely on the provided amendment text to RCW 35.57.010. The document appears to be part of a larger bill; other sections (for example, an effective date, other related amendments, or replacement deadlines) are not included here. The prior text shows a parenthetical deletion of a July 1, 2026 deadline for one creation provision, but the amendment text in these extracts does not state whether any new deadline or replacement language appears elsewhere. The term "regional center" is referenced but not defined in this excerpt, and detailed procedures under chapter 39.34 RCW are not reproduced here.
Why it matters
Powered by Legitron
If enacted, more cities and towns — especially those in counties under 1 million people and certain small cities inside larger counties that already started regional center construction — would be able to form or join public facilities districts (PFDs) and to create new, overlapping PFDs while keeping older districts active. Practically this gives those local governments more ways to pool authority and resources to build or run facilities and to exercise the powers of a municipal taxing authority, which means new options to raise revenue and enter contracts but also new responsibilities for appointing and overseeing boards and sharing costs with neighboring jurisdictions. The law also sets how boards must be composed and appointed, requires equal representation rules for multi-city districts, and shortens the window for lawsuits challenging a district to 30 days, which makes projects faster to finalize but gives opponents less time to contest them. Important implementation details are missing here — for example exact deadlines, an effective date, and what the bill means by “regional center” — so the timing, scope of taxing or financing actions, and some operational choices may remain unclear until those parts are available.
Official Documents View Full Bill Text
Follow this bill

SHB 2530 Position - A premium account is required to save position information.

Saving your position first...
Generating hearing testimony using your position and notes...
Generating Bill Comment using your position and notes...

Click to view plans

SHB 2530 Details and Bill Topics

Details

Date Introduced 01/30/2026
Originating Chamber House
Biennium 2025-26
Total Campaign Dollars Backing Bill $467,003.53

Bill Topics

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

SHB 2530 Sponsors and Committee Hearings

Sponsors

Representative Doglio (Primary)
Representative Parshley

Committee Hearings

Hearing House Local Government (Public)
Hearing House Local Government (Executive)
Go to SHB 2530 at leg.wa.gov

SHB 2530 Bill Timeline

Viable
2/2/2026
HRules R
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
1/29/2026
HRules R
LG - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
1/29/2026
HRules R
LG - Executive action taken by committee.
1/15/2026
HRules R
First reading, referred to Local Government.

You have 3 pending action.

Legitron™ is a trademark of Legislative Labs, Inc.

© 2026 - Legislative Labs · Privacy Policy · Terms & Conditions · Manage Privacy