| Momentum Bucket | Became Law |
| Legal Title | AN ACT Relating to the removal of vehicles by certain cities when obstructing the operation of streetcar vehicles or jeopardizing public safety; |
| Bill Description | Addressing the removal of vehicles by certain cities when obstructing the operation of streetcar vehicles or jeopardizing public safety. |
|
What this bill does
Powered by Legitron |
This bill reenacts and amends RCW 46.55.010 (definitions) and amends RCW 46.55.080 to change how and when vehicles may be impounded and what procedures and records tow operators must follow. It adds an immediate-removal category for vehicles left in a city right-of-way used for streetcar operations when the vehicle obstructs streetcar operation or jeopardizes public safety (limited to a city with population greater than 700,000). It also expressly authorizes impoundment at the direction of law enforcement, authorized regional transit authority representatives, authorized city representatives, other public officials with jurisdiction, or property owners/agents for private property.
The amendment imposes procedural requirements: a signed authorization at the time and place of impound is required from the person requesting a private impound or the public official requesting a public impound before a registered tow truck operator may proceed; registered tow truck operators, employees, and agents are prohibited from serving as the property owner’s agent for signing impound authorizations or independently identifying vehicles for impound; private impound authorizations must include a specified liability statement; tow operators must record and retain dates and times vehicles are taken into and released from custody, make entries in a master log and make that log available to the department or the state patrol on request; and persons engaging in towing activities may not be associated with a person or business whose main activity is authorizing vehicle impounds. The bill also defines terms including “abandoned vehicle” (a vehicle impounded and held 120 consecutive hours), “immobilize,” “impound” and various removal time frames for public and private locations.
Affected parties named include registered tow truck operators and their employees or agents, law enforcement, authorized transit and city representatives, property owners or their agents, the department (not identified in the text provided), the Washington State Patrol, and vehicle owners. The text references other RCW sections for specific rules and cross-references 2023 changes, but those sections are not included here, and the specific prior or changed language from the 2023 provisions is not provided. The bill names “a city with a population greater than 700,000” but does not identify the city, and the department referenced is not specified in the extracted text.
|
|
Why it matters
Powered by Legitron |
If enacted, the law would make it routine for vehicles that block streetcar tracks in a very large city to be towed immediately and would require tow companies to get a signed, on-the-spot authorization before taking privately owned cars. Registered tow operators would face new, enforceable recordkeeping duties (logging times in a master log and keeping abandoned vehicles for 120 hours before disposal) and could not act as the property owner’s agent or sign impound authorizations themselves. Property owners who request private tows would have to sign a written authorization that includes a liability statement, so they may bear greater risk if the tow is later found improper.
The people most affected are tow companies and their employees (more paperwork, tighter conduct rules, and potential liability), property owners and private agents (must be present to authorize tows and could face liability), law enforcement and authorized transit or city representatives (expanded immediate-impound authority in certain rights-of-way), and vehicle owners (faster removal in specified locations). Important implementation details are unclear from these facts: the bill refers to “the department” without naming it, it does not identify which city qualifies as having a population over 700,000, and it relies on other RCW sections not provided here, so some operational specifics and how this differs from current practice cannot be determined from the excerpt.
|
| Official Documents | View Full Bill Text |
| Date Introduced | 01/15/2026 |
| Originating Chamber | House |
| Biennium | 2025-26 |
| Total Campaign Dollars Backing Bill | $3,175,074.75 |
| MOTOR VEHICLES |
| Hearing | House Transportation (Public) |
| Hearing | House Transportation (Executive) |
| Hearing | Senate Transportation (Public) |
| Hearing | Senate Transportation (Executive) |