LegislativeLabs.ai Logo
Legislative Labs
  • Bring the Statehouse to your House.
    • FAQ

      Help using Legislative Labs
    • Support

      Contact us for assistance.
    • Legal

      Terms & Conditions.
    • Privacy

      What we do with your information.
    • Choose Your Plan

      Track, Act, Learn.
    • Analytics

      Intelligence & analytics on previous sessions.
    • Bill History

      Detailed historical bill information.
    • Sponsor Detail

      Detailed sponsor bill performance.
    • About Us

      The reason for Legislative Labs.
    • Classroom

      Bring the Statehouse to the Schoolhouse.
    • BETA

      Session Dashboard

      Live predictions on introduced legislation.
    • BETA

      Bill Drafting

      Predictions on draft legislation.
    • BETA

      Legitron AI

      Legislation made simple with AI.
    • Session Results

      Legislative session analytics.
    • Sign in

SHB 2343

Momentum Bucket Strong Momentum
Legal Title AN ACT Relating to protecting the public from water quality impacts of publicly owned or operated game farms;
Bill Description Protecting the public from water quality impacts of publicly owned or operated game farms.
What this bill does
Powered by Legitron
This bill (Substitute House Bill 2343, 69th Legislature, 2026) adds new sections to chapter 77.12 RCW and chapter 90.48 RCW and requires that when a state department operates any publicly owned or operated facility where wildlife or other animals are held, confined, propagated, hatched, fed, or otherwise raised in numbers and circumstances that would qualify the facility as a concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO), the department must obtain a water discharge permit consistent with the bill. Upon determining a publicly owned facility would qualify as a CAFO, the department must either begin applying and enforcing the CAFO general permit requirements or issue an individual CAFO permit to the facility. The new provisions set minimum permit requirements or equivalent department‑required measures, including a manure pollution prevention plan, production area runoff controls, land application limits, protocols for management of dead animals, a prohibition on discharges that cause or contribute to violations of water quality standards, and logistical compliance measures such as monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting. A facility with more than 5,000 game birds at any time must be treated as a large CAFO and subject to the most protective water quality standards applicable to any CAFO category. The department’s powers, duties, enforcement provisions, and remedies under chapter 90.48 RCW are made applicable to these publicly owned facilities in the same manner as they apply to privately owned CAFOs. Legally, this is a procedural and regulatory change: it creates new statutory permitting requirements for publicly operated facilities that meet CAFO criteria and extends existing CAFO enforcement authority to those facilities. The act states Section 2 is effective immediately. The text provided does not explicitly identify which “department” is referenced, does not include existing CAFO threshold definitions from chapter 90.48 RCW for full comparison, and does not provide fee, penalty, or detailed timing provisions for updates to the CAFO general permit or the Department of Ecology’s actions. Legislative findings referenced groundwater monitoring and an investigation at the Bob Oke game farm, but those technical reports or data are not included in the provided text.
Why it matters
Powered by Legitron
If enacted, publicly owned or operated facilities that hold or raise animals in numbers that would qualify as a concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) will have to obtain a CAFO-style water discharge permit right away and follow required pollution controls, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting. Facilities with more than 5,000 game birds are treated as “large” CAFOs and must meet the most protective water quality standards, and the operating state department must either apply the CAFO general permit requirements to its facilities or issue individual permits and use existing enforcement authorities the same way they apply to private CAFOs. The people most affected are public operators of game farms and other animal-holding facilities (state agencies and local governments), who will likely face new planning and operational duties and added costs for manure and runoff controls, monitoring, recordkeeping, permit applications, and possible enforcement actions. The Department of Ecology and the unnamed operating department will have to update and enforce permitting, but the bill text here leaves unclear which specific department is meant, what permit fees or penalties will apply, and the detailed technical or timing rules for those permits.
Official Documents View Full Bill Text
Follow this bill

SHB 2343 Position - A premium account is required to save position information.

Saving your position first...
Generating hearing testimony using your position and notes...
Generating Bill Comment using your position and notes...

Click to view plans

SHB 2343 Details and Bill Topics

Details

Date Introduced 01/29/2026
Originating Chamber House
Biennium 2025-26
Total Campaign Dollars Backing Bill $893,258.31

Bill Topics

FISH AND WILDLIFE, DEPARTMENT OF

SHB 2343 Sponsors and Committee Hearings

Sponsors

Representative Abbarno (Primary)
Representative Orcutt
Representative Jacobsen
Representative Graham

Committee Hearings

Hearing House Environment & Energy (Public)
Hearing House Environment & Energy (Executive)
Hearing Senate Agriculture & Natural Resources (Public)
Go to SHB 2343 at leg.wa.gov

SHB 2343 Bill Timeline

Strong Momentum
3/11/2026
HRules 3C
By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.
2/18/2026
HRules 3C
First reading, referred to Agriculture & Natural Resources.
2/16/2026
HRules 3C
Third reading, passed; yeas, 97; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 1.
2/16/2026
HRules 3C
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
2/16/2026
HRules 3C
1st substitute bill substituted.
2/5/2026
HRules 3C
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
2/2/2026
HRules 3C
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
1/28/2026
HRules 3C
ENVI - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
1/28/2026
Hsubst for
ENVI - Executive action taken by committee.
1/11/2026
Hsubst for
First reading, referred to Environment & Energy.
1/7/2026
Hsubst for
Prefiled for introduction.

You have 3 pending action.

Legitron™ is a trademark of Legislative Labs, Inc.

© 2026 - Legislative Labs