| Momentum Bucket | Early Stage |
| Legal Title | AN ACT Relating to expanding the definition of law enforcement personnel regarding correctional officers for purposes of interest arbitration; |
| Bill Description | Expanding the definition of law enforcement personnel regarding correctional officers for purposes of interest arbitration. |
|
What this bill does
Powered by Legitron |
This bill reenacts and amends RCW 41.56.030, the definitional section of chapter 41.56 RCW (public employee collective bargaining). The primary change shown in the extracted text is an expanded and detailed definition of "uniformed personnel" and a set of updated definitions used throughout the chapter. This is a modification to existing law (a reenactment and amendment of a statutory definition), not the creation of a new substantive crime or penalty.
The amended text lists categories of uniformed personnel (subsections (a)–(j)) and other defined terms. The uniformed personnel list explicitly includes law enforcement officers under RCW 41.26.030; correctional employees (uniformed and nonuniformed, commissioned and noncommissioned security personnel) who work in jails, correctional facilities, or juvenile detention facilities located in a county with population over 1,500,000 and who are trained to control and maintain custody of inmates; general authority port peace officers in large counties; security forces under RCW 43.52.520; firefighters and certain port district fire and crash rescue employees; fire/emergency medical dispatchers; advanced life support technicians; county court marshals commissioned by sheriffs; and public safety telecommunicators except those employed by the Washington State Patrol or other state agencies. The text also defines a number of other terms used in the chapter (for example, adult family home provider, bargaining representative, collective bargaining, commission and executive director, family child care provider, various public employee and public employer rules, language access provider with specific date ranges, and limits such as no more than one personal assistant per judge or commissioner may be excluded from a bargaining unit).
The extracted material identifies affected agencies and programs (Public Employment Relations Commission and executive director; DSHS, DCYF, Medicaid programs; Department of Labor and Industries; state agencies using language access providers; counties, port districts, municipal airports; Fish and Wildlife; Washington State Patrol; jails, correctional and detention facilities; fire departments and emergency medical services; courts and sheriffs; listed institutions of higher education). The document chunk provided contains only the amended RCW 41.56.030 text; it does not show other sections of the bill, any interest arbitration provisions referenced by the bill title, or the prior statutory text for a before/after comparison. The presence of double parentheses suggests parts of prior law were deleted, but the exact prior language and the full scope of other changes in the bill are not included in the extracted facts.
|
|
Why it matters
Powered by Legitron |
If enacted, the main practical effect is that more jail and detention staff in very large counties (those with populations over 1.5 million) would be classified as "uniformed personnel," which means they would be treated under the separate rules and processes that apply to uniformed employees under state collective bargaining law. That change will most directly affect those correctional employees and their county employers: it is likely to change who can be represented, how disputes are handled, and could increase county labor costs or administrative work if new bargaining or arbitration procedures become available to that group.
County governments, jail and detention facilities, and the Public Employment Relations Commission would see the biggest operational impact because they would need to apply the amended definition and potentially adjust bargaining, staffing, and budget plans. The document you provided only shows the definitional change and related exclusions; it does not include the other bill sections (for example, any specific interest arbitration rules or fiscal details), so the exact procedural or cost outcomes are uncertain.
|
| Official Documents | View Full Bill Text |
| Date Introduced | 01/12/2026 |
| Originating Chamber | House |
| Biennium | 2025-26 |
| Total Campaign Dollars Backing Bill | $2,311,728.50 |
| PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT AND EMPLOYEES |
| Hearing | House Labor & Workplace Standards (Public) |