LegislativeLabs.ai Logo
Legislative Labs
  • Bring the Statehouse to your House.
    • FAQ

      Help using Legislative Labs
    • Support

      Contact us for assistance.
    • Legal

      Terms & Conditions.
    • Privacy

      What we do with your information.
    • Choose Your Plan

      Track, Act, Learn.
    • Analytics

      Intelligence & analytics on previous sessions.
    • Bill History

      Detailed historical bill information.
    • Sponsor Detail

      Detailed sponsor bill performance.
    • About Us

      The reason for Legislative Labs.
    • Classroom

      Bring the Statehouse to the Schoolhouse.
    • BETA

      Session Dashboard

      Live predictions on introduced legislation.
    • BETA

      Bill Drafting

      Predictions on draft legislation.
    • BETA

      Legitron AI

      Legislation made simple with AI.
    • Session Results

      Legislative session analytics.
    • Sign in

HB 1225

Momentum Bucket Viable
Legal Title AN ACT Relating to reforming the Washington state budgeting process through requiring prioritized spending on essential state functions, placing limitations on state spending and revenue proposals, and requiring accountability for every dollar spent within the state budget;
Bill Description Reforming the Washington state budgeting process through requiring prioritized spending on essential state functions, placing limitations on state spending and revenue proposals, and requiring accountability for every dollar spent within the state budget.
What this bill does
Powered by Legitron
House Bill 1225 (H-0391.2), a 2025 bill introduced in the Washington House and referred to the Appropriations Committee, amends RCW 43.88.030 and RCW 43.88.055, adds new sections to chapter 43.88 RCW, creates a new section, and declares an emergency so the act takes effect immediately. The bill imposes detailed new procedural requirements for the governor’s biennial budget documents (including content, schedules, and assumptions), requires the director of financial management to provide agencies with submission instructions at least three months before agency budget documents are due, and requires the governor’s proposals to be based on official revenue and caseload forecasts or OFM estimates where forecasts are not available. It also specifies how revenues must be estimated, what capital and operating budget information must be included, and requires the governor’s operating budget beginning in the 2021–2023 biennium to leave a positive ending fund balance and to have a projected maintenance level that does not exceed “available fiscal resources” for the next ensuing biennium (with certain statutory exceptions noted). The bill changes legislative budget procedures by amending RCW 43.88.055 to require a balanced omnibus operating appropriations bill (language beginning in the 2013–2015 biennium is referenced), by defining “available fiscal resources,” “projected maintenance level,” and “related funds” (the latter identified to include several specific education-related accounts), and by creating a new zero-based budget review process: the legislature will identify programs for review beginning in 2026 and every even-numbered year, agencies must submit zero-based reviews beginning with the 2027–2029 biennium, specified committees must hold public hearings, and submissions must be filed electronically on a LEAP-managed fiscal website. The bill also requires operating appropriations to be enacted in separate, prioritized bills in a specified order (debt service first, K–12 basic education second, then revenue administration, public safety, public health, public assistance, other state purposes, and finally the legislature/judiciary/statewide elected officials), and requires that all biennial appropriation bills be enacted no later than 30 days before the start of the fiscal biennium. The bill adds extensive capital budget reporting requirements (project site, size, life, phased costs, funding sources, operating impacts, and multi-biennia plans and schedules) and assigns a joint legislative/OFM committee to define “capital project.” Several provisions are incomplete in the extracted text: a verification requirement in the capital subsection is cut off, some amendment text to RCW 43.88.055 and implementation details for assigning agencies to priority categories are missing, and the final definition of “capital project” and other referenced formats or standards are deferred or not provided. No new criminal penalties or substantive criminal law changes are included in the provided extracts; the bill is primarily procedural and fiscal in nature.
Why it matters
Powered by Legitron
If enacted, state budgeting would face stricter fiscal discipline and clearer funding priorities: the governor and OFM must produce more detailed operating and capital budget documents, the governor’s budget must show a positive ending general fund balance and keep projected maintenance spending within available resources, and the legislature must adopt a four-year balanced omnibus operating appropriations bill. Agencies and institutions will likely need to shift priorities and staffing to meet new documentation and review demands—major capital projects over $5 million must break out component costs and operating impacts, institutions of higher education must justify unexpected capital cost increases, and agencies selected for the new zero-based budget reviews (beginning with submissions for 2027-2029) will face recurring program-level scrutiny that could change funding or require program cuts or redesigns. The bill also changes process and timing: operating appropriations must be enacted in a specified priority order (debt service first, then basic K-12, revenue collection, public safety, health, assistance programs, other state purposes, and finally legislature/judiciary/statewide officials), and all biennial appropriation bills must be passed at least 30 days before the biennium starts; the act takes effect immediately. Important details are unclear from the available text—key definitions (including “capital project”), some amendment language to RCW 43.88.055, and the full rules for assigning agencies to priority categories are cut off—so the exact scope and implementation timeline for some requirements remain uncertain.
Official Documents View Full Bill Text
Follow this bill

HB 1225 Position - A premium account is required to save position information.

Saving your position first...
Generating hearing testimony using your position and notes...
Generating Bill Comment using your position and notes...

Click to view plans

HB 1225 Details and Bill Topics

Details

Date Introduced 01/13/2025
Originating Chamber House
Biennium 2025-26
Total Campaign Dollars Backing Bill $1,905,844.25

Bill Topics

BUDGETS
LEGISLATURE

HB 1225 Sponsors and Committee Hearings

Sponsors

Representative Couture (Primary)
Representative Connors
Representative Low
Representative Jacobsen
Representative Rude
Representative McClintock
Representative Keaton
Representative Walsh
Representative Ley
Representative Dufault
Representative Barnard
Representative Valdez

Committee Hearings

Go to HB 1225 at leg.wa.gov

HB 1225 Bill Timeline

Viable
1/11/2026
HApprops
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
1/12/2025
HApprops
First reading, referred to Appropriations.
1/8/2025
HApprops
Prefiled for introduction.

You have 3 pending action.

Legitron™ is a trademark of Legislative Labs, Inc.

© 2026 - Legislative Labs